IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamics of adaptive immunity against phage in bacterial populations

Author

Listed:
  • Serena Bradde
  • Marija Vucelja
  • Tiberiu Teşileanu
  • Vijay Balasubramanian

Abstract

The CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) mechanism allows bacteria to adaptively defend against phages by acquiring short genomic sequences (spacers) that target specific sequences in the viral genome. We propose a population dynamical model where immunity can be both acquired and lost. The model predicts regimes where bacterial and phage populations can co-exist, others where the populations exhibit damped oscillations, and still others where one population is driven to extinction. Our model considers two key parameters: (1) ease of acquisition and (2) spacer effectiveness in conferring immunity. Analytical calculations and numerical simulations show that if spacers differ mainly in ease of acquisition, or if the probability of acquiring them is sufficiently high, bacteria develop a diverse population of spacers. On the other hand, if spacers differ mainly in their effectiveness, their final distribution will be highly peaked, akin to a “winner-take-all” scenario, leading to a specialized spacer distribution. Bacteria can interpolate between these limiting behaviors by actively tuning their overall acquisition probability.Author summary: The CRISPR system in bacteria and archaea provides adaptive immunity by incorporating foreign DNA (spacers) into the genome, and later targeting DNA sequences that match these spacers. The way in which bacteria choose spacer sequences from a clonal phage population is not understood. Our model considers competing effects of ease of acquisition and effectiveness against infections in shaping the spacer distribution. The model suggests that a diverse spacer population results when the acquisition rate is high, or when spacers are similarly effective. At moderate acquisition rates, the spacer distribution becomes highly sensitive to spacer effectiveness. There is a rich landscape of behaviors including bacteria-phage coexistence and oscillations in the populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Serena Bradde & Marija Vucelja & Tiberiu Teşileanu & Vijay Balasubramanian, 2017. "Dynamics of adaptive immunity against phage in bacterial populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005486
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005486
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005486&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005486?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luciano A. Marraffini & Erik J. Sontheimer, 2010. "Self versus non-self discrimination during CRISPR RNA-directed immunity," Nature, Nature, vol. 463(7280), pages 568-571, January.
    2. Asaf Levy & Moran G. Goren & Ido Yosef & Oren Auster & Miriam Manor & Gil Amitai & Rotem Edgar & Udi Qimron & Rotem Sorek, 2015. "CRISPR adaptation biases explain preference for acquisition of foreign DNA," Nature, Nature, vol. 520(7548), pages 505-510, April.
    3. David Paez-Espino & Wesley Morovic & Christine L. Sun & Brian C. Thomas & Ken-ichi Ueda & Buffy Stahl & Rodolphe Barrangou & Jillian F. Banfield, 2013. "Strong bias in the bacterial CRISPR elements that confer immunity to phage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 1-7, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antun Skanata & Edo Kussell, 2021. "Ecological memory preserves phage resistance mechanisms in bacteria," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lidiya Lisitskaya & Yeonoh Shin & Aleksei Agapov & Anna Olina & Ekaterina Kropocheva & Sergei Ryazansky & Alexei A. Aravin & Daria Esyunina & Katsuhiko S. Murakami & Andrey Kulbachinskiy, 2022. "Programmable RNA targeting by bacterial Argonaute nucleases with unconventional guide binding and cleavage specificity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Jack P. K. Bravo & Cristian Aparicio-Maldonado & Franklin L. Nobrega & Stan J. J. Brouns & David W. Taylor, 2022. "Structural basis for broad anti-phage immunity by DISARM," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Pierre Aldag & Marius Rutkauskas & Julene Madariaga-Marcos & Inga Songailiene & Tomas Sinkunas & Felix Kemmerich & Dominik Kauert & Virginijus Siksnys & Ralf Seidel, 2023. "Dynamic interplay between target search and recognition for a Type I CRISPR-Cas system," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Ning Cui & Jun-Tao Zhang & Zhuolin Li & Xiao-Yu Liu & Chongyuan Wang & Hongda Huang & Ning Jia, 2022. "Structural basis for the non-self RNA-activated protease activity of the type III-E CRISPR nuclease-protease Craspase," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Yekaterina S Pavlova & David Paez-Espino & Andrew Yu Morozov & Ilya S Belalov, 2021. "Searching for fat tails in CRISPR-Cas systems: Data analysis and mathematical modeling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.