IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1002899.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Significantly Improved HIV Inhibitor Efficacy Prediction Employing Proteochemometric Models Generated From Antivirogram Data

Author

Listed:
  • Gerard J P van Westen
  • Alwin Hendriks
  • Jörg K Wegner
  • Adriaan P IJzerman
  • Herman W T van Vlijmen
  • Andreas Bender

Abstract

Infection with HIV cannot currently be cured; however it can be controlled by combination treatment with multiple anti-retroviral drugs. Given different viral genotypes for virtually each individual patient, the question now arises which drug combination to use to achieve effective treatment. With the availability of viral genotypic data and clinical phenotypic data, it has become possible to create computational models able to predict an optimal treatment regimen for an individual patient. Current models are based only on sequence data derived from viral genotyping; chemical similarity of drugs is not considered. To explore the added value of chemical similarity inclusion we applied proteochemometric models, combining chemical and protein target properties in a single bioactivity model. Our dataset was a large scale clinical database of genotypic and phenotypic information (in total ca. 300,000 drug-mutant bioactivity data points, 4 (NNRTI), 8 (NRTI) or 9 (PI) drugs, and 10,700 (NNRTI) 10,500 (NRTI) or 27,000 (PI) mutants). Our models achieved a prediction error below 0.5 Log Fold Change. Moreover, when directly compared with previously published sequence data, derived models PCM performed better in resistance classification and prediction of Log Fold Change (0.76 log units versus 0.91). Furthermore, we were able to successfully confirm both known and identify previously unpublished, resistance-conferring mutations of HIV Reverse Transcriptase (e.g. K102Y, T216M) and HIV Protease (e.g. Q18N, N88G) from our dataset. Finally, we applied our models prospectively to the public HIV resistance database from Stanford University obtaining a correct resistance prediction rate of 84% on the full set (compared to 80% in previous work on a high quality subset). We conclude that proteochemometric models are able to accurately predict the phenotypic resistance based on genotypic data even for novel mutants and mixtures. Furthermore, we add an applicability domain to the prediction, informing the user about the reliability of predictions. Author Summary: Infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) currently cannot be cured. It can however be contained through treatment with a combination of several anti-viral drugs. Yet, during treatment resistance can occur which leads to drugs becoming ineffective. Through a combination of drugs, this resistance can be deferred indefinitely. The optimal combination of drugs depends on the specific strain of HIV with which the patient is infected. Previously, methods have been developed that predict a personalized treatment regimen based on the genetic sequence (genotype) of the virus via the use of computer modeling, corner stone of the methods is drug affinity prediction. Here we have applied proteochemometric modeling which takes this genetic information into account, but also includes chemical description of the drugs that are now clinically available. We show that this combined technique performs better than models that only include genetic information. Our approach leads to personalized treatment predictions with a higher reliability compared to the current state of the art. In addition, we include a reliability measure which allows each prediction to be assessed for reliability. Finally we describe mutations of the HIV genome that were not previously described in literature and lead to resistance to treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerard J P van Westen & Alwin Hendriks & Jörg K Wegner & Adriaan P IJzerman & Herman W T van Vlijmen & Andreas Bender, 2013. "Significantly Improved HIV Inhibitor Efficacy Prediction Employing Proteochemometric Models Generated From Antivirogram Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002899
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002899
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002899&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002899?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerard J P van Westen & Jörg K Wegner & Peggy Geluykens & Leen Kwanten & Inge Vereycken & Anik Peeters & Adriaan P IJzerman & Herman W T van Vlijmen & Andreas Bender, 2011. "Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-13, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dong-Sheng Cao & Yi-Zeng Liang & Zhe Deng & Qian-Nan Hu & Min He & Qing-Song Xu & Guang-Hua Zhou & Liu-Xia Zhang & Zi-xin Deng & Shao Liu, 2013. "Genome-Scale Screening of Drug-Target Associations Relevant to Ki Using a Chemogenomics Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.