IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1002131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Binding Free Energy Landscape of Domain-Peptide Interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Iskra Staneva
  • Stefan Wallin

Abstract

Peptide recognition domains (PRDs) are ubiquitous protein domains which mediate large numbers of protein interactions in the cell. How these PRDs are able to recognize peptide sequences in a rapid and specific manner is incompletely understood. We explore the peptide binding process of PDZ domains, a large PRD family, from an equilibrium perspective using an all-atom Monte Carlo (MC) approach. Our focus is two different PDZ domains representing two major PDZ classes, I and II. For both domains, a binding free energy surface with a strong bias toward the native bound state is found. Moreover, both domains exhibit a binding process in which the peptides are mostly either bound at the PDZ binding pocket or else interact little with the domain surface. Consistent with this, various binding observables show a temperature dependence well described by a simple two-state model. We also find important differences in the details between the two domains. While both domains exhibit well-defined binding free energy barriers, the class I barrier is significantly weaker than the one for class II. To probe this issue further, we apply our method to a PDZ domain with dual specificity for class I and II peptides, and find an analogous difference in their binding free energy barriers. Lastly, we perform a large number of fixed-temperature MC kinetics trajectories under binding conditions. These trajectories reveal significantly slower binding dynamics for the class II domain relative to class I. Our combined results are consistent with a binding mechanism in which the peptide C terminal residue binds in an initial, rate-limiting step. Author Summary: The complex biological processes occurring in living organisms are enabled by numerous networks of interacting proteins. It is therefore of great interest to understand the physical interplay between proteins and, in particular, how this process gives rise to highly specific network connectivities. For a long time, the dominant molecular view of protein-protein interactions was the docking of more or less static folded structures, with specificity obtained from a complementarity in shape and charge distributions. Lately it has been realized that many of the links in protein networks are mediated by interactions between folded domains, on the one hand, and disordered polypeptide segments, on the other. We use an all-atom Monte Carlo based approach which attempts to capture this domain-peptide binding process in full and apply it to representative members of a common domain family. This allows us to examine and compare detailed aspects of the binding free energy landscapes which underlie specificity and affinity. Being able to model domain-peptide binding in a physically sound, yet computationally tractable way is essential for identifying molecular binding mechanisms and opens up possibilities for modifying interaction networks in a controlled way.

Suggested Citation

  • Iskra Staneva & Stefan Wallin, 2011. "Binding Free Energy Landscape of Domain-Peptide Interactions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-9, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002131
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002131
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002131&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002131?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evangelia Petsalaki & Alexander Stark & Eduardo GarcĂ­a-Urdiales & Robert B Russell, 2009. "Accurate Prediction of Peptide Binding Sites on Protein Surfaces," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-10, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iskra Staneva & Yongqi Huang & Zhirong Liu & Stefan Wallin, 2012. "Binding of Two Intrinsically Disordered Peptides to a Multi-Specific Protein: A Combined Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Study," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-9, September.
    2. Arnab Bhattacherjee & Stefan Wallin, 2013. "Exploring Protein-Peptide Binding Specificity through Computational Peptide Screening," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-10, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xinyi Liu & Bin Liu & Zhimin Huang & Ting Shi & Yingyi Chen & Jian Zhang, 2012. "SPPS: A Sequence-Based Method for Predicting Probability of Protein-Protein Interaction Partners," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-6, January.
    2. Iskra Staneva & Yongqi Huang & Zhirong Liu & Stefan Wallin, 2012. "Binding of Two Intrinsically Disordered Peptides to a Multi-Specific Protein: A Combined Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Study," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-9, September.
    3. Arnab Bhattacherjee & Stefan Wallin, 2013. "Exploring Protein-Peptide Binding Specificity through Computational Peptide Screening," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-10, October.
    4. Mahdi Sarmady & William Dampier & Aydin Tozeren, 2011. "Sequence- and Interactome-Based Prediction of Viral Protein Hotspots Targeting Host Proteins: A Case Study for HIV Nef," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-11, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.