IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/page00/0000043.html

Comprehensive assessment of lifetime cigarette smoking and its association with health-related quality of life among older US adults

Author

Listed:
  • James D Sargent
  • Jenny E Ozga
  • Cassandra A Stanton
  • Zhiqun Tang
  • Laura M Paulin

Abstract

Cigarette smoking has a modest association with health-related quality of life (QOL), largely due to its causal role in cancer, cardiovascular disease, and chronic lung disease. However, prior studies have often underestimated exposure by using limited measures of smoking, by including young adults, and by adjusting for smoking related diseases—which mediate the association. We aimed to examine the association between a comprehensive index of lifetime cigarette smoke exposure (LCSEI) and QOL among older adults in the USA. We analyzed data for 7,001 U.S. adults ≥ 40y from an available US sample (wave 5 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study). The 11-point LCSEI included heaviness of smoking, pack-years, childhood smoking, and second-hand smoke exposure. QOL measures included PROMIS global physical and mental health (GPH, GMH) scores. We estimated the multivariable association between LCSEI scores and mean GPH or GMH, adjusting for sociodemographics, BMI, and weekly exercise but not smoking-related diseases. Regarding lifetime smoking, 6.7% smoked during childhood, and 16.9% currently smoked. In the multivariable analysis, high vs. low LCSEI was associated with significant reductions in mean GPH (−14.5%) and GMH (−15.2%), significantly more than reductions for extremes of education (−3.0% and −5.3% respectively) and comparable to extremes of income (−10.9% and −11.4% respectively). Sensitivity analysis found that associations were greatly attenuated but remained significant even after further adjustment for smoking-related diseases. Among older adults, reducing lifetime cigarette smoking could yield gains in QOL similar in magnitude to those associated with narrowing socioeconomic inequalities, highlighting importance of eliminating cigarettes to promote healthy aging. For the poor, disadvantage delivers a double blow to QOL: directly, through the material hardships of poverty, and indirectly, through greater lifetime exposure to cigarette smoke.Author summary: Most people know that cigarette smoking is bad for health, but prior research has likely underestimated just how much it affects quality of life — particularly in older adults who have experienced decades of exposure. In this study, we developed a comprehensive measure of lifetime cigarette smoke exposure that captured not just current smoking, but also how heavily people smoked, how many years they smoked, whether they started as children, and how much secondhand smoke they were exposed to. We found that the quality-of-life burden associated with high lifetime smoking exposure was far larger than prior studies suggested — exceeding the burden associated with differences in education and rivaling the burden of poverty itself — highlighting the importance of eliminating cigarettes to promote healthy aging. Perhaps most striking is what this means for who bears the greatest burden of poor health. Lower-income adults already suffer from a reduced quality of life due to material hardship. Because they also smoke at higher rates, they bear a double burden: lower quality of life from socioeconomic disadvantage and lower quality of life from their greater lifetime smoking. Our findings suggest that tobacco control not only improves public health generally but also narrows the socioeconomic health outcomes gap, delivering greatest benefit to older adults most in need.

Suggested Citation

  • James D Sargent & Jenny E Ozga & Cassandra A Stanton & Zhiqun Tang & Laura M Paulin, 2026. "Comprehensive assessment of lifetime cigarette smoking and its association with health-related quality of life among older US adults," PLOS Aging and Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(3), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:page00:0000043
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.page.0000043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/agingandhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.page.0000043
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/agingandhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.page.0000043&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.page.0000043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:page00:0000043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: agingandhealth The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask agingandhealth to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/agingandhealth/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.