IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/rocere/v10y2023i2p70-82id3473.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variational model with image denoising fitting term for boundary extraction of breast ultrasound images

Author

Listed:
  • Nurdina Badrulhisam
  • Nurhuda Ismail
  • Abdul Kadir Jumaat
  • Mohd Azdi Maasar
  • Mohamed Faris Laham

Abstract

A variational model was used to extract or segment the breast ultrasound (BUS) image boundary in order to find a closed curve line of the abnormality region for further diagnosis. A recent selective variational model, termed the Convex Distance Selective Segmentation (CDSS) model, is effective at segmenting a specific image object. However, the CDSS model has difficulty segmenting noisy images. Unavoidable noise in BUS pictures leads to poor segmentation, as is widely recognized. The objective of this work is to propose a reformulation of the Convex Distance Selective Segmentation (CDSS) model for the purpose of segmenting BUS pictures. Consideration of four distinct image Denoising algorithms—Gaussian filter, Median filter, Wiener filter, and Rudin-Osher-Fatemi (ROF) algorithm—as the new fitting terms in the CDSS model leads to four variants of modified CDSS models called Modified CDSS based on Gaussian filter (MCDSSG), Modified CDSS based on Median filter (MCDSSM), Modified CDSS based on Wiener filter (MCDSSW) and Modified CDSS based on ROF (MCDSSROF). To solve the modified models, we first derived the associate Euler-Lagrange equation and solved it in Matrix Laboratory (MATLAB) software. Experiments demonstrated that the proposed MCDSSROF model based on the ROF denoising algorithm provided the highest average of Peak-Signal-To-Noise-Ratio (PSNR), Dice, and Jaccard Similarity Coefficients, indicating the highest denoising quality and segmentation accuracy in comparison to other models.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurdina Badrulhisam & Nurhuda Ismail & Abdul Kadir Jumaat & Mohd Azdi Maasar & Mohamed Faris Laham, 2023. "Variational model with image denoising fitting term for boundary extraction of breast ultrasound images," Review of Computer Engineering Research, Conscientia Beam, vol. 10(2), pages 70-82.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:rocere:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:70-82:id:3473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/76/article/view/3473/7720
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/76/article/view/3473/8065
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:rocere:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:70-82:id:3473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/76/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.