IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijppar/v6y2019i1p12-22id1407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualisation of Lack of Discipline and Probity as the Main Cause towards Good Governance Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Abdul-Kahar Adam
  • Ebi Shahrin Bin Suleiman
  • Nasser Salim Moh Alsadi

Abstract

This is a qualitative paper which is to present the facts and literature findings on the causes of good governance practice in Ghana conceptually. It is noted that discipline and probity are the backbone of good governance. Every country in this modern era want to achieve good governance so that there will be improvement in the economic fortunes but this cannot be achieved if there is lack of discipline and lack of probity in the practice. Hence, literature reveals that there are some relationships between discipline (independent variable), probity (mediating variable) and good governance (dependent variable). Good governance is the main important factor to eradicating poverty and advancing development, said by the UN former Secretary General – Kofi Annan (Court, 2001). This research is purely a conceptual research and a model/conceptual framework has been proposed for future scientific research. Hypothesis has been proposed which need to be developed and tested for effective and efficient conclusion in future findings as such. This research only proposes the concepts that are associated with good governance practice – discipline and probity; the methods used are the secondary sources of data findings were analyzed. Future research findings, analysis and recommendation is eminent on this proposed concept model for future researchers. Therefore, a strong methodology is needed to support all the findings and interpretations of the hypothesis. In this instance, quantitative and qualitative study as a mixed method would be suitable for future research to test relationships and hypothesis that are been identified in the proposed conceptual model.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdul-Kahar Adam & Ebi Shahrin Bin Suleiman & Nasser Salim Moh Alsadi, 2019. "Conceptualisation of Lack of Discipline and Probity as the Main Cause towards Good Governance Practice," International Journal of Public Policy and Administration Research, Conscientia Beam, vol. 6(1), pages 12-22.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijppar:v:6:y:2019:i:1:p:12-22:id:1407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/74/article/view/1407/1954
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/74/article/view/1407/5112
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijppar:v:6:y:2019:i:1:p:12-22:id:1407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/74/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.