IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijonsr/v6y2018i1p6-14id2369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Laboratory Evaluation of ITS Test on Asphalt Modified with Various Ranges of Crumb Rubber

Author

Listed:
  • Asmaa Abdulmaged MAMHUSSEINI
  • Barham Jalal NAREEMAN

Abstract

The rubber which is generated from scrap tyres (tires), identified by crumb or powdered rubber. Day after day, discarded or scrap tyres create huge environmental problems. As long as the scrap tyres are regarded as a non-decade material those disrupt the clean environment. Using this rubber in pavement and asphalt has become a great interest and proposal for researchers for overcome this issue in recent years. Researchers and engineers discovered another way to improve asphalt concrete, by adding crumb rubber (CR) into asphalt concrete. This is done by two methods; first method rubber placed in bitumen and completely or partially reacted with bitumen, this will become binder modifier (wet process). Second method replacing this rubber with fine aggregates which are not dissolved completely with bitumen (dry process). In this study crumb rubber is added into mixture initially by substituting rubber with amount of fine aggregate. Thereafter laboratory tests; penetration, ductility, softening point, elastic recovery and moisture susceptibility test were conducted. These tests were performed, investigated and compared to evaluate the effect of indirect tensile strength (ITS) on asphalt concrete modified with several ranges of crumb rubber. It has been shown that (0%) is control sample, while (2, 4, 6, 8 and 10) are percent of rubber by the total weight of aggregate. One of the critical issues in asphalt pavement is moisture damage. The existence of moisture play a great role in reducing the stiffness of the asphalt mix as well as makes the chance for stripping of the asphalt from the aggregate. This study evaluates the strength loss by comparing two methods of ITS test, which are conditioned (tested in saturated state) and unconditioned (tested in dry state) samples. Marshall Mix method was applied for preparation of total 24 samples for both states of ITS. The results show that for conditioned samples 6% of CR gives the highest value of tensile strength, (892) Kpa. While in unconditioned samples, 10% of CR gives even higher value of strength, compared to conditioned and control sample, (933) Kpa. According to AASHTO T 283-14, the tensile strength ratio (TSR) results of all samples are within the standards, using the minimum value of 80%. For asphalt modified with (2, 4, 6, 8 and 10) % of CR, the TSR values are (95.3, 97.7, 97.4, 93.6 and 90.9) % respectively. Moreover the results are discussed in detail in this study. As summary, the optimal dose of CR is 4% which gives better performance for penetration, softening point, elastic recovery and tensile strength ratio.

Suggested Citation

  • Asmaa Abdulmaged MAMHUSSEINI & Barham Jalal NAREEMAN, 2018. "Laboratory Evaluation of ITS Test on Asphalt Modified with Various Ranges of Crumb Rubber," International Journal of Natural Sciences Research, Conscientia Beam, vol. 6(1), pages 6-14.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijonsr:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:6-14:id:2369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/63/article/view/2369/3559
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/63/article/view/2369/5431
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijonsr:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:6-14:id:2369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/63/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.