IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijomas/v4y2015i12p237-247id1016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison between Decision Making Method for Success Right or Wrong of Software Development Project

Author

Listed:
  • Kazuhiro Esaki
  • Kizuku Kuwahara
  • Tetsu Sagae

Abstract

For a purpose of improvement of project management, we should determine the success right or wrong of project objectively and quantitatively. On the other hand, a decision of success right or wrong of software development projects has been evaluated subjectively by a questionnaire for stakeholders concerned. Furthermore, the study of definition of project success right or wrong and quantitative decision techniques is not found. Recently, gathering of the attribute data about software development projects in Japan has been performed by the IPA/SEC (Software Engineering Centre of the Information-Technology Promotion Agency Japan). Therefore, we developed the diagnostic technique to judge the success right or wrong on a project by a discriminant analysis based on the actual data of IPA/SECs in the precedent study. Also, we tried to develop the diagnostic technique of success right or wrong of project based on the “Success degree estimation mode” in this study. In this paper, we would like to propose the result of comparison between the effectiveness of these diagnostic techniques of the project.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazuhiro Esaki & Kizuku Kuwahara & Tetsu Sagae, 2015. "Comparison between Decision Making Method for Success Right or Wrong of Software Development Project," International Journal of Management and Sustainability, Conscientia Beam, vol. 4(12), pages 237-247.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijomas:v:4:y:2015:i:12:p:237-247:id:1016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/11/article/view/1016/1405
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijomas:v:4:y:2015:i:12:p:237-247:id:1016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/11/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.