IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijomas/v3y2014i6p384-392id971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theories of Knowledge: A Critical Examination of the Validity of Different Kinds of Explanations

Author

Listed:
  • Sirajul Haque
  • Sharif Ahmed Abbasi

Abstract

The theories of knowledge are the most important areas of knowledge. The major issue in “Theories of knowledge”, is the real source of obtaining the knowledge. In the field of philosophy of social sciences, the theories of knowledge and its different kinds of explanations provides basis for conducting research. Regarding the theories of knowledge, Rationalism and Empiricism are the two main sources of acquiring knowledge. The followers of rationalism believe that logics are the primary source of knowledge for conducting research and the followers of empiricism believe that experience is the primary source of knowledge. In this regard, the paper has described that how the theory of induction and deduction works. The research paper has critically discussed the observations of followers of these two schools of thoughts and has examined the validity of different kinds of explanations i.e Scientific Explanations and Social Explanations. The research paper has thoroughly discussed the theories and models of explanation and attempted to answer the following questions; what are the problems with the theories of knowledge? What is the nature of different kinds of explanation? What is the validity of different kinds of explanations?. In the end, the paper has presented conclusion from the critical discussion in the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Sirajul Haque & Sharif Ahmed Abbasi, 2014. "Theories of Knowledge: A Critical Examination of the Validity of Different Kinds of Explanations," International Journal of Management and Sustainability, Conscientia Beam, vol. 3(6), pages 384-392.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijomas:v:3:y:2014:i:6:p:384-392:id:971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/11/article/view/971/1346
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijomas:v:3:y:2014:i:6:p:384-392:id:971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/11/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.