IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijomah/v9y2022i1p10-17id2953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ Perception of Learning Organization Dimensions

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Ruwayi F Alatawi
  • Olfat A Salem
  • Zakari MA Nazik

Abstract

Converting the healthcare delivery system into a learning organization is essential for improving health outcomes. As nurses are the forces that implement changes to meet organizational objectives, they are continuously involved in the learning process. This study aims to explain the learning organization dimensions as perceived by Nursing staff in Saudi Arabia. This is a descriptive study that uses a convenience sample of 550 nurses. Data was collected using The Dimensions of the Learning Organization Questionnaire (DLOQ). The questionnaire consists of seven dimensions of learning organization. The DLOQ is based on a six-point Likert scale which was scored from 1-6. The study found the highest perceived dimension was “Embedded Systems.” While the lowest perceived dimension was “Empowerment.” The study concluded that while some dimensions were perceived highly by nurses like embedded systems, some dimensions, like system connections and empowerment, were perceived lowly which indicates areas of weaknesses in the organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Ruwayi F Alatawi & Olfat A Salem & Zakari MA Nazik, 2022. "Nurses’ Perception of Learning Organization Dimensions," International Journal of Medical and Health Sciences Research, Conscientia Beam, vol. 9(1), pages 10-17.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijomah:v:9:y:2022:i:1:p:10-17:id:2953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/9/article/view/2953/6129
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/9/article/view/2953/6412
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijomah:v:9:y:2022:i:1:p:10-17:id:2953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/9/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.