IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijomah/v4y2017i1p1-11id2272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Right to Dignity and Consensus in the Psychiatric Health Treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Milena Marinič

Abstract

Theoretical frameworks: Health workers in practice obtain the informed consent of the patient where there is an invasion of privacy. Health data are processed without consent, health treatment is carried out without informed consent, and is taken to the patient the possibility of an appeal, does not receive information about what to do and where to seek help, if necessary. Methods: Based on the long-term observation of conduct of healthcare workers, the analysis of legal acts and synthesis of statutory provisions for informed consent based arguments. Results Health workers against health interventions with greater impact on privacy and the integrity of the body does not obtain informed consent, offer a preprinted form. The patient is given an explanation focus, which is the duty doctor. Interpretation duty is not subject recording in health documentation which makes it impossible to trace back. Discussions Health professionals legislature requires compliance with legal rules, education in terms of knowledge of the law, it does not reach a satisfactory level. Health workers do not know the laws, and the patient's rights not exercised. In order to ensure the legal documentation is necessary to inform all health professionals with the laws and knowledge documentation.

Suggested Citation

  • Milena Marinič, 2017. "The Right to Dignity and Consensus in the Psychiatric Health Treatment," International Journal of Medical and Health Sciences Research, Conscientia Beam, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijomah:v:4:y:2017:i:1:p:1-11:id:2272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/9/article/view/2272/3396
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/9/article/view/2272/5857
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijomah:v:4:y:2017:i:1:p:1-11:id:2272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/9/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.