IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijobem/v6y2019i1p1-15id1203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Participatory Decision Making on Organisational Goal Attainment

Author

Listed:
  • Nwanah Chizoba P
  • Ofobruku Sylvester Abomeh
  • Okafor Chika M
  • Mba Njide M

Abstract

The study centred on participatory decision making and organizational goal attainment. This study investigated the extent to which participative decision making affects the organizational goal attainment. The study had a sample size of 136 obtained using the Cochran statistical formula. The study employed a survey research design. The instrument used for data collection was the questionnaire. The data from the responses were presented in frequencies, simple percentages. Three hypotheses were tested using the chi-square X2 and t-test statistical tools. The study found out that: Employee participation in decision making significantly improves job productivity (X2 cal = 2.554 > X2 0.5 = 0.6763); employee participation in decision, making relates to employee motivation (Fc – test = 21 .56 > ft 1 = 2.01); the policy of employee participation in decision-making is significant in organizational goal attainment (X2 Cal = 1.887 > X2 0.5 = 0.6763) The study, based on the above findings, concluded that for the goal attainment of any organization to be achieved successfully depended on the extent to which the organization integrated the workers into the policy formulation and implementation. The study recommends that organizations should adopt the ring show management theory as a way of survival.

Suggested Citation

  • Nwanah Chizoba P & Ofobruku Sylvester Abomeh & Okafor Chika M & Mba Njide M, 2019. "Impact of Participatory Decision Making on Organisational Goal Attainment," International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, Conscientia Beam, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijobem:v:6:y:2019:i:1:p:1-15:id:1203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/62/article/view/1203/1691
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/62/article/view/1203/5007
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijobem:v:6:y:2019:i:1:p:1-15:id:1203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/62/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.