IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijcper/v7y2020i1p18-45id1818.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Evaluation of PFR and CSTR 1- Reactor Tank for Formaldehyde Petrochemical Production

Author

Listed:
  • Wordu Animia A
  • Elechi Chidinma T

Abstract

CSTR 1-reactor tank and PFR plug flow reactor for the production of formaldehyde are two reactors subjected to performance studies. The research models were derived from the fundamental principles of conservation of mass and energy balance; and qualitative kinetic optimum model for the determination of yields for the dehydrogenation and partial oxidation of methanol in the two reactors at 600-6500C. The data obtained for model evaluation were statistically regressed to adopt it as engineering data which is adequate for applications in the evaluation process. The design models for the CSTR 1-reactor tank and PFR plug flow reactor reactors were appropriately solved. The results obtained on the two reactors parameters are given as follows: CSTR 1-reactor tank volume 2.85m3, Height 5.69m, Space-time 0.12hr, Space-velocity 0.67/hr, pressure drop and heat generated per unit volume 2.34*107J/m3. Similarly, PFR volume 1.26m3, Height 12.58m, Space-time 0.225hr, Space-velocity 0.182/hr, pressure drop 3.73*10-8 and heat generated per unit volume 1.17*108 J/m3, And, innovatively, results of optimal yields Yopt calculation for CSTR 1-reactor tank and Plug flow reactor PFR showed that the yields obtained for the two reactors are 69% and 87% and compare favorably with operational yields of the production process which stood at 78.5% and 80.1%. From the results PFR provide a better volume for the production of formaldehyde at 87% conversion of 1.26m3. Hence, the PFR has a better performance for the production of formaldehyde with 87% feed conversion.

Suggested Citation

  • Wordu Animia A & Elechi Chidinma T, 2020. "Performance Evaluation of PFR and CSTR 1- Reactor Tank for Formaldehyde Petrochemical Production," International Journal of Chemical and Process Engineering Research, Conscientia Beam, vol. 7(1), pages 18-45.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijcper:v:7:y:2020:i:1:p:18-45:id:1818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/65/article/view/1818/2551
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/65/article/view/1818/5447
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijcper:v:7:y:2020:i:1:p:18-45:id:1818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/65/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.