IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/hassle/v9y2021i3p250-259id896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Earnings Quality and Audit Quality: Analysis of Investor Reaction

Author

Listed:
  • Deden Tarmidi
  • Etty Murwaningsari
  • Zuhal Maftuh Ahnan

Abstract

This study aims to analyze investor reaction to management behavior in preparing financial reports, especially earnings quality and audit quality. We also analyze the effect of financial performance as moderation. Generally, investors react positively to a company's financial performance, but the amount of fraud surrounding financial information, including auditor cooperation, raises big questions for investors about a company's financial information. We analyzed companies within the manufacturing sector that were listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2015 to 2019, and it was found that investors reacted positively to earnings quality and audit quality moderated by financial performance. These results provide evidence that management should focus on earnings quality in financial reports and on the audit process to ensure quality and exceptional financial performance to obtain positive reactions from investors, which has a positive impact on increasing the value of companies’ shares. This study used the stock prices on the publication date of the financial statements, which reflect the direct reactions of investors to the information contained in the financial statements, such as earnings quality, audit quality, and financial performance. The different investor reactions were apparent on the day of the deadline for submitting financial statements according to existing regulations. These results reflect that the use of stock prices on the publication dates more accurately describes the reaction of investors than on the deadline for submitting financial statements.

Suggested Citation

  • Deden Tarmidi & Etty Murwaningsari & Zuhal Maftuh Ahnan, 2021. "Earnings Quality and Audit Quality: Analysis of Investor Reaction," Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, Conscientia Beam, vol. 9(3), pages 250-259.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:hassle:v:9:y:2021:i:3:p:250-259:id:896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/73/article/view/896/1276
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/73/article/view/896/6015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:hassle:v:9:y:2021:i:3:p:250-259:id:896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/73/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.