IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/hassle/v7y2019i2p74-89id821.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of ESL Students Comprehension of LOTS and HOTS Questions According to Gender

Author

Listed:
  • Subadrah Madhawa Nair
  • Zhang Yan
  • Walton Wider

Abstract

Several studies have indicated that ESL students in China are weak in answering comprehension questions which are based on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). The objectives of this study were to investigate students’ overall performance in answering LOTS and HOTS ESL comprehension questions, to compare students LOTS and HOTS comprehension question answering skills according to gender and to gauge teachers’ views on how to improve students LOTS and HOTS ESL comprehension skills. The LOTS and HOTS comprehension questions in this study were based on Bloom’s taxonomy. This descriptive study used the QUAN-qual model, whereby the quantitative data was collected using a comprehension test and the qualitative data was collected through interviews via SKYPE. The sample of this study consisted of 100 ESL third year high school students from Urumqi, China and their three ESL teachers. The data collected from the comprehension test was analyzed using the independent samples t-test and paired samples t-test (SPSS Program for Windows). The qualitative data was analyzed based on emerging themes. The findings revealed that the students performed significantly better at answering LOTS questions compared with HOTS questions. The findings also indicated that female students scored significantly higher in answering LOTS and HOTS comprehension questions compared with their male counterparts. The analysis of teacher interviews indicated that Chinese students were able to answer LOTS questions but they struggled to answer HOTS questions because they had limited vocabulary, lacked critical thinking skills and failed to use the right strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Subadrah Madhawa Nair & Zhang Yan & Walton Wider, 2019. "Analysis of ESL Students Comprehension of LOTS and HOTS Questions According to Gender," Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, Conscientia Beam, vol. 7(2), pages 74-89.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:hassle:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:74-89:id:821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/73/article/view/821/1168
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/73/article/view/821/5939
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:hassle:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:74-89:id:821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/73/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.