IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/hassle/v6y2018i1p10-15id795.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Gamified Assessment Replace Traditional Tests?

Author

Listed:
  • Filomachi Spathopoulou

Abstract

This paper analyzes the potential of gamified tests as a replacement for conventional tests, and the benefits and challenges of the application of gamification in universities and colleges. It looks into the pros and cons of the use of gamification in higher education, reviews the application of gaming elements in assessments and suggests that the incorporation of gamified activities in some of the practical tasks in the classroom helps to develop and nurture the students’ practical competences. The article concludes that although the potential of gamified assessment cannot be ignored, the idea that gamification can result in the mastering of the theoretical concepts has not been proven.

Suggested Citation

  • Filomachi Spathopoulou, 2018. "Can Gamified Assessment Replace Traditional Tests?," Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, Conscientia Beam, vol. 6(1), pages 10-15.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:hassle:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:10-15:id:795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/73/article/view/795/1135
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/73/article/view/795/5910
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:hassle:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:10-15:id:795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/73/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.