IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/hassle/v13y2025i2p750-766id4299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Desire to visit again cultural tourism: Role of destination attractiveness, perceived risk, cultural contact in encouraging tourist satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Susi Evanita
  • Zul Fahmi

Abstract

Silokek Geopark’s tourism is a natural site that attracts visitors due to its diverse historical relics and its geological, biological, and cultural variety. This study aims to identify the factors influencing tourist satisfaction with attractions in the Silokek Geopark and to explore how satisfaction with perceived risks and cultural contact affects their intention to revisit. The research involved 250 respondents who had previously visited the area conducted in 2021. A purposive sampling method was employed with a survey-based approach. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) through Smart PLS 3. The findings reveal that facilities, services, and interpersonal interactions are key elements that enhance visitor satisfaction. A higher level of satisfaction is positively correlated with a stronger intention to return. Conversely, perceived risks related to time, cost, performance, physical, and socio-psychological factors can negatively impact revisit intentions. Cultural contact also emerged as an important variable although further refinement through more specific indicators is necessary for accurate measurement. The study concludes that positive tourist experiences significantly increase satisfaction and diminish negative perceptions of travel-related sacrifices. Therefore, policymakers and destination managers should strategically manage and promote the destination’s unique values while effectively mitigating perceived risks to sustain and enhance tourism attractiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Susi Evanita & Zul Fahmi, 2025. "Desire to visit again cultural tourism: Role of destination attractiveness, perceived risk, cultural contact in encouraging tourist satisfaction," Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, Conscientia Beam, vol. 13(2), pages 750-766.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:hassle:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:750-766:id:4299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/73/article/view/4299/8635
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:hassle:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:750-766:id:4299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/73/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.