IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/hassle/v13y2025i2p676-690id4294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the reliability and validity of adapted LASRS-2 in the Chinese context using the AMOS-SEM approach

Author

Listed:
  • Li Yanyan
  • Yoon Fah Lay
  • Gao Tongtong
  • Li Lihua
  • Hou Xiujuan

Abstract

This pilot study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Lakaev Academic Stress Response Scale-2 (LASRS-2) in the context of Chinese college students. 186 undergraduate students from Xinyang College, China were enlisted for this research. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to analyze data using the Amos Structural Equation Modeling (AMOS-SEM) methodology. Factor loading and composite reliability (CR) were used to identify the reliability criteria. Moreover, the average variance extracted (AVE) was used as an index of convergent validity and the heterotrait-monotrait criterion (HTMT) as the index of discriminant validity. The research results showed that the adapted LASRS-2 has good reliability and validity indicators after minor modifications for Chinese college students. The adapted LASRS-2 can be used in the future related to research in the Chinese context. The adapted LASRS-2 can measure college students' academic stress response involving four domains (affective response, behavioral response, cognitive response, and physiological response).

Suggested Citation

  • Li Yanyan & Yoon Fah Lay & Gao Tongtong & Li Lihua & Hou Xiujuan, 2025. "Examining the reliability and validity of adapted LASRS-2 in the Chinese context using the AMOS-SEM approach," Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, Conscientia Beam, vol. 13(2), pages 676-690.
    • Handle: RePEc:pkp:hassle:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:676-690:id:4294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/73/article/view/4294/8630
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:hassle:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:676-690:id:4294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/73/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.