IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/hassle/v11y2023i3p338-348id3514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The study on the customer-based brand equity of the hypermarkets in Shanghai, China

Author

Listed:
  • Wong Chee Hoo
  • Yu Peng

Abstract

The study aims to find out if a well-known brand equity model can be used in the Chinese hypermarket industry. How Aaker's customer-based brand equity model affects the overall brand equity of hypermarkets in Shanghai, China. The mall intercept method is used to collect data from the public. A survey was administered using the structured questionnaire at hypermarkets in Shanghai. The questionnaire used a seven-point Likert scale to record the responses, with one representing "strongly disagree" and seven representing "strongly agree." A total of 385 samples were successfully collected. The research showed that brand awareness, perceived quality, and brand loyalty were significantly related to total supermarket brand equity. On the other hand, brand association was found to have no significant influence on brand equity. A hypermarket’s brand loyalty is the most essential consideration for valuing its brand equity. Based on these findings, it was concluded that the brand equity model is generalizable across industries, including the hypermarket business. Thus, supermarkets must do an overall equity assessment that takes into account the relative influence of the aforementioned factors. This research is vital for large hypermarkets that are working to enhance their brands’ value proposition.

Suggested Citation

  • Wong Chee Hoo & Yu Peng, 2023. "The study on the customer-based brand equity of the hypermarkets in Shanghai, China," Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, Conscientia Beam, vol. 11(3), pages 338-348.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:hassle:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:338-348:id:3514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/73/article/view/3514/7785
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:hassle:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:338-348:id:3514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/73/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.