IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/frmrev/v6y2020i1p52-78id1738.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International Financial Reporting Standards Adoption and Earnings Management: The Fundamental Effect Framework

Author

Listed:
  • NWAUBANI Anthony Nzeribe Chizue

Abstract

The study mainly examined effect of adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards on earnings management and earnings quality in banks using a new approach - Fundamental Effect Framework. Specifically, effect on profit after tax, net interest income and ratio of loan loss provisioning of the Nigerian banks were examined. Ex-post facto research design was adopted. Secondary data on nine listed deposit money banks were analyzed using Paired Student t-test. The banks were those whose annual financial reports for 2011 and 2012 were available and contained figures under Nigerian GAAP and IFRS-equivalent of the 2011 figures. Findings revealed that IFRS adoption in Nigeria results in insignificant rise in earnings management and low earnings quality as measured by Profit After Tax and Ratio of Loan Loss Provision but leads to insignificant reduced earnings management and improved earnings quality in terms of net interest income. It is concluded that though some individual banks recorded significant reduction in earnings management under IFRS, fundamentally, the adoption in has no significant effect on earnings management and earnings quality of the banks based on the reported performance as at the date of the mandatory adoption in Nigeria. The study recommends inter-alia that IFRS Foundation and the national reporting authorities in all IFRS jurisdictions should monitor implementation and application of IFRS9 to minimize likely manger’s discretion under the “forward -looking expected- credit loss” model of the IFRS 9.

Suggested Citation

  • NWAUBANI Anthony Nzeribe Chizue, 2020. "International Financial Reporting Standards Adoption and Earnings Management: The Fundamental Effect Framework," Financial Risk and Management Reviews, Conscientia Beam, vol. 6(1), pages 52-78.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:frmrev:v:6:y:2020:i:1:p:52-78:id:1738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/89/article/view/1738/2413
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/89/article/view/1738/4966
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:frmrev:v:6:y:2020:i:1:p:52-78:id:1738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/89/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.