IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/criasc/v12y2025i2p123-134id4308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of selected microbial isolates from maize rhizosphere on disease incidence and severity of maize common smut disease caused by Ustilago maydis

Author

Listed:
  • Rosemary Osendi Opwondi
  • David Mutisya Musyimi
  • Phoebe Anyango Sikuku

Abstract

The study was conducted to evaluate the effect of selected microbial isolates from the maize rhizosphere on the incidence and severity of maize common smut disease, which causes a decline in maize production. The rhizosphere contains microorganisms with potential antagonistic activities against microbial diseases. However, there is limited information regarding their use as biocontrol agents. The maize varieties Dk 8033 and Duma 43 were used because they have a short maturity period, are recently released, and are highly preferred by farmers. In-vitro screening of microbial isolates against Ustilago maydis was conducted using the dual culture method in a completely randomized design, with three replicates. Greenhouse experiments followed a completely randomized design with ten treatments, also in triplicate. Data on growth inhibition, disease incidence, and severity were collected. Significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) were observed among isolates. The highest in-vitro inhibition was recorded by fungal isolate MF14 (22.0 mm, unidentified), followed by Serratia sp. (19.0 mm), Bacillus sp. (16.0 mm), and Aspergillus sp. (15.0 mm). In greenhouse trials, MF14 showed the lowest disease incidence (49.3%), while Serratia sp. had the highest (84.3%). These findings highlight the potential of selected microbial isolates, especially MF14, as promising biocontrol agents for managing maize common smut.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosemary Osendi Opwondi & David Mutisya Musyimi & Phoebe Anyango Sikuku, 2025. "Effect of selected microbial isolates from maize rhizosphere on disease incidence and severity of maize common smut disease caused by Ustilago maydis," Current Research in Agricultural Sciences, Conscientia Beam, vol. 12(2), pages 123-134.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:criasc:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:123-134:id:4308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/68/article/view/4308/8644
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:criasc:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:123-134:id:4308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/68/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.