IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Emerging Issues in The Implementation of Irrigation and Drainage Sector Reforms in Sindh, Pakistan

Listed author(s):
  • Junaid Alam Memon

    (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad)

  • Usman Mustafa

    (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad)

This study analysed the implementation of institutional reforms seeking a paradigm shift from the state to a farmer-managed irrigation and drainage system in Sindh Province of Pakistan. The required information was taken from a one-page profile of 354 Farmer Organisations (FOs) and in-depth interviews with the key officials and farmers. The findings revealed that out of 14 Area Water Boards (AWBs) and 1,400 FOs, only three AWBs and 354 FOs could be formed and transferred the management responsibility of their respective channels. All of the farmers, having land irrigated by an irrigation channel, were by default general body members of the respective FO. The average landholding size of the largest and smallest landholder in a FO was 98 and 3 hectares in NC-AWB, 84 and 2.5 hectares in GC-AWB and 176 and 5 hectares in LBC-AWB. The unequal land distribution caused differential social and political power of the farmers in the agrarian society and thereby had the implications for the participatory irrigation management (PIM). Although, the available information did not permit a rigorous analysis of the large landholders’ capture of FO Management Committees (MCs), one could comprehend the lower bounds of such tendency. It was gathered that the large landholders could capture the MCs of at least 40 percent of the FOs in NC-AWB, 36 percent of the FOs in GC-AWB and 33 percent of the FOs in LBC-AWB. The majority of the large landholders were holding MCs as Chairmen, Vice Chairmen, General Secretaries, Treasurers and a few as just Members. The smallest landholders in MCs were found mostly as Members. Finally, despite having a substantial number of female landholders in FO general bodies, their participation in MCs was negligible across all AWBs. The study concludes that the overall progress in implementation of the reforms was slow and unsatisfactory both in quantitative and qualitative terms. Nonetheless, it could be taken as an opportunity to learn from the past experiments as the basis for determining the future course of irrigation and drainage reforms and management in the country.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PDR/2012/Volume4/289-301.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Pakistan Institute of Development Economics in its journal The Pakistan Development Review.

Volume (Year): 51 (2012)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
Pages: 289-301

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:51:y:2012:i:4:p:289-301
Contact details of provider: Postal:
P.O.Box 1091, Islamabad-44000

Phone: (92)(51)9248051
Fax: (92)(51)9248065
Web page: http://www.pide.org.pk
Email:


More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:51:y:2012:i:4:p:289-301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Khurram Iqbal)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.