IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pfq/journl/v53y2008i3p441-448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tax theories – what is the message of the history of theories for today?

Author

Listed:
  • Botos, Katalin

Abstract

In modern economy social policy is at the highest level in the hierarchy of policies. All other policies: the economic policy, sectoral policy, including the industrial and agricultural policy, transport policy, energy policy, monetary and fiscal and foreign exchange policy as well as science policy must serve social policy purposes. The political forces with the popular mandate to govern must have a clear vision about the society they want to create and about the main characteristics of that social concept. Namely, whether individuals or families are its basic units, whether income differences are small or large, how public welfare is interpreted, and whether it expects more or less from the state. As a matter of fact, the whole constitutional system must indicate an ideal social structure to be achieved and it is the obligation of the prevailing power to make every effort to further that. The constitutional system adopted after the change of regime was, as a matter of course, civic democracy based on the respect of private property. Economic policy as a whole must aim to implement the selected social concept. Civic democracies have several different models. Some are based on laissez-faire society, while others, striving to build a welfare society, assign greater role to the state. The model of social market economy, the one that Hungary chose, in theory, after the change of the political system, had developed from ordo-liberal ideas. In this model the economy is left to be shaped basically by market forces, but a strong social net is operated. These are naturally ideal forms, nevertheless, there are several developed countries which fall into one or the other category.

Suggested Citation

  • Botos, Katalin, 2008. "Tax theories – what is the message of the history of theories for today?," Public Finance Quarterly, Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 53(3), pages 441-448.
  • Handle: RePEc:pfq:journl:v:53:y:2008:i:3:p:441-448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://unipub.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/9185/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pfq:journl:v:53:y:2008:i:3:p:441-448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam Hoffmann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bkeeehu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.