Investment, Growth, and Uniformity versus Selectivity in Capital Income Taxation: Testing the King-Fullerton Framework
This paper criticises the view that deviations from uniformity in capital taxation, as measured by dispersion of effective marginal tax rates in the King-Fullerton (1984) framework, are always undesirable. International evidence shows a consistent pattern of tax selectivity. We argue that in presence of investment externalities, particularly in the case of machinery, some degree of tax discrimination may be justified. Moreover, there is no evidence that standard deviations of effective tax wedges and investment or growth are inversely correlated. Troubles arise not with the method in itself, but with a less than careful use of its results for policy conclusions.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): 55 (2008)
Issue (Month): 1-2 ()
|Contact details of provider:|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pfi:pubfin:v:55:y:2008:i:1-2:p:64-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.