IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Sensitivity of Individual Income Tax in the United States, 1979-2004

  • Ram, Rati
Registered author(s):

    Partly following the research done by Blackburn (1967), Musgrave and Musgrave (1984), Musgrave and Thin (1948), Pechman (1973), Ram (1991), and Tanzi (1969, 1976), sensitivity of individual income tax in the United States is studied for the period 1979-2004. Besides a brief discussion of the major tax-law changes and description of various tax-income ratios, ten points are noted. First, elasticity of tax revenue with respect to adjusted gross income (AGI) shows a sizable fall from 1979 to 1989. Second, there is a fair recovery in the elasticity from 1990 to 2001. Third, these variations reflect the tax-law changes during the Reagan-era of the 1980s and Clinton's initiatives of the 1990s. Fourth, significance of the income distribution variable (Gini) in the tax equation noted by Ram (1991) almost disappeared by 1989, which may also indicate an erosion of the tax progression suggested by fall in the tax elasticity. Fifth, corresponding to the recovery in the size of the tax elasticity, significance of the Gini-parameter tended to improve during 1991-2004, but its magnitude did not reach the levels observed for 1979-1980 and earlier periods. Sixth, the relatively steady magnitude of the tax elasticity from 2001 to 2004 may indicate that the possible erosion of tax progressivity due to the tax laws enacted during 2001-2004 may not yet have been fully captured in the data. Seventh, while estimates for years up to 1992 show that omission of the income-distribution term (Gini) causes the tax elasticity to be understated, the pattern since the mid-1990s is the opposite, apparently due to a change in the sign of income-Gini correlation. Eighth, estimates of Tanzi-type (1976) elasticities of "rate structure" and "tax base" indicate an expected pattern. Ninth, Tanzi-type "built-in flexibilities" also show an expected pattern that corresponds to the ratios of tax to AGI, tax to taxable income, and taxable income to AGI. Tenth, measures of average-rate progression, defined by Musgrave and Musgrave (1984, p. 362), for selected years indicate that while the expected decline with AGI is observed, the progression is negative across the two top AGI groups for 1999 and 2004. Four additional points are also noted. First, as in Ram (1991), the tax-model that is quadratic in income does not do well. Second, estimates based on state-level Gini from census and annual surveys look fairly similar, but Gini parameter tends to be weaker in the latter. Third, cross-section elasticity estimates from AGI classes, of the kind used by Blackburn (1967) and others, seem less stable and informative than Tanzi-type estimates from state-level data. Fourth, along with the well-known increase in inequality since the late 1970s, the correlation between Gini and AGI (and tax) is negative until 1992, but turns positive in later years.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Article provided by in its journal Public Finance = Finances publiques.

    Volume (Year): 55 (2008)
    Issue (Month): 1-2 ()
    Pages: 1-21

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:pfi:pubfin:v:55:y:2008:i:1-2:p:1-21
    Contact details of provider:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pfi:pubfin:v:55:y:2008:i:1-2:p:1-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.