IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pet/annals/v8i2y2008p289-296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Risk in Large Audit Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Sorin-Sandu Vînătoru

    (University of Craiova, Romania)

  • George Calotă

    (The Central Unit for Harmonizing the Internal Audit from Romania, The Ministry of Economy and Finance, Romania)

Abstract

This paper analyze and discuss organizational risk in large-audit firms and contribute to auditing theory on how organizational risk may be analyzed. The study is conducted as a review of literature on audit-firm organization, risk management, professions and organization theory .Large-audit firms are commonly organized as partnerships relying on hierarchy and standardization of work processes to control work. The paper argues that this may be an effective way of organizing audit work in a stable environment. In a volatile environment, however, the strategy becomes highly risky. The focus of the paper is on the organization of large-audit firms and its findings do, therefore, not necessarily apply to small audit firms. The paper presents a general view of the way large-audit firms are organized and controlled. Local variations may occur but these are not analyzed in the paper. Wer analyzes the inherent organizational risk of the common way of organizing audit work and is therefore of direct interest to partners and other professionals in large-audit firms. It may also be seen as an example of how organizational-risk analysis can be applied in the audit process and it discusses the competences needed to perform such analysis

Suggested Citation

  • Sorin-Sandu Vînătoru & George Calotă, 2008. "Organizational Risk in Large Audit Firms," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 8(2), pages 289-296.
  • Handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:8:i:2:y:2008:p:289-296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upet.ro/annals/pdf/Annals-2008-Part2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:8:i:2:y:2008:p:289-296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Imola Driga (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.upet.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.