IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pdc/jrpieb/v11y2012i2p69-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of the Lithuanian and Russian Biotechnology sectors

Author

Listed:
  • Vincentas Giedraitis
  • Alina Alekseyko

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to compare the development of the Lithuanian and Russian biotechnology sectors. In case of Lithuania we tried to uncover what are the circumstances surrounding the favorable development of the biotechnology sectors in Lithuania. In case of Russian Federation we looked at encouraging as well as discouraging circumstances surrounding this segment of economy. Drawing upon Schumpeter’s ideas of innovation and Porter’s business cluster theory, we argue that Lithuania is “at the right place and the right time” to make it a regional leader in Baltic biotechnology. Russia, on the other hand, is in the process of developing biotech sector in order to at least to catch up with other countries (including Lithuania). It will take time and continuous governmental support for Russia before this sector starts contributing significantly to Russian economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincentas Giedraitis & Alina Alekseyko, 2012. "A comparison of the Lithuanian and Russian Biotechnology sectors," Perspectives of Innovation in Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center, vol. 11(2), pages 69-86, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:pdc:jrpieb:v:11:y:2012:i:2:p:69-86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://academicpublishingplatforms.com/downloads/pdfs/pieb/volume11/201607180353_07_PIEB_Vol11_Issue2_2012_Giedratis_et_al_Comparison_biotechnology_pp.69-86.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://academicpublishingplatforms.com/article.php?journal=PIEB&number=11&article=763
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Biotechnology; innovation; Lithuania; Russia; Schumpeter; business cluster theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B59 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Other
    • F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe
    • O57 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Comparative Studies of Countries

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pdc:jrpieb:v:11:y:2012:i:2:p:69-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jaroslav Holecek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pradecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.