IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pdc/jrnbeh/v12y2016i3p75-93.html

The paradox of thrift in an inegalitarian neoclassical economy

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Ben Ridha Mabrouk

Abstract

Schilcht (1975) and Bourguignon (1981) studied the case of a convex saving function in the Stiglitz (1969) model. They have shown that if one of the two proportions of the rich or the poor is below a certain threshold, there is a two-class equilibrium. However, they have only proved the existence of this threshold. We give here a system of equations to calculate this threshold which we interpret as the maximum proportion of rich for having a stable two-class configuration. If the proportion of rich exceeds this threshold, the economy enters a phase of decline although the golden-rule capital has not yet been reached. The mechanism of this decline recalls the description given in Keynes (1936), of the decline which happens when there is too much savings in an inegalitarian context. This is an example of what is known as the "paradox of thrift". It is remarkable that this paradox takes place in a neoclassical setting that does not include key Keynesian elements such as saturation of demand, monetization of savings, short-term effects, expectation problems, involuntary unemployment and rigidities. Numerical simulations are given to illustrate and analyze the mechanisms involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Ben Ridha Mabrouk, 2016. "The paradox of thrift in an inegalitarian neoclassical economy," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 12(3), pages 75-93, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:pdc:jrnbeh:v:12:y:2016:i:3:p:75-93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://academicpublishingplatforms.com/downloads/pdfs/beh/volume23/201702161452_07_BEH_Vol12_Issue3_2016_Mohamed_Mabrouk_Paradox_of_thrift_in_inegalitarian_neoclassical_economy_pp.75-93.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://academicpublishingplatforms.com/article.php?journal=BEH&number=23&article=2283
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mabrouk, Mohamed, 2017. "Is Rentier Capitalism That Bad? Rent, Efficiency and Inequality Dynamics," MPRA Paper 81565, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Mohamed ben Ridha MABROUK, 2018. "Is rentier capitalism that bad? Rent, efficiency and inequality dynamics," Turkish Economic Review, EconSciences Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 107-135, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D99 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Other
    • E13 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Neoclassical
    • E21 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Consumption; Saving; Wealth
    • E22 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Investment; Capital; Intangible Capital; Capacity
    • O41 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pdc:jrnbeh:v:12:y:2016:i:3:p:75-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jaroslav Holecek The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Jaroslav Holecek to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pradecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.