IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

La controversia sobre la teoría del capital

  • Félix Jiménez


    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú)

Este capítulo presenta el contenido de la controversia en torno a la teoría del capital que se llevó a cabo entre los economistas más importantes de las universidades de Cambridge (Inglaterra) y Cambridge (Estados Unidos). Primero se presenta las proposiciones fundamentales de la teoría neoclásica, es decir, las parábolas neoclásicas. La segunda sección aborda las críticas de Joan Robinson a la teoría neoclásica del capital y las críticas de Garegnani a la teoría de la productividad marginal decreciente. En la tercera parte, se expone el intento de Samuelson de validar la función de producción neoclásica y los principales errores que él comete. La cuarta sección presenta la respuesta de Solow y la crítica de Nell. Finalmente, en la quinta sección, se señalan los principales aportes de esta controversia sobre la teoría del capital.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú in its journal Revista Economia.

Volume (Year): 35 (2012)
Issue (Month): 70 ()
Pages: 142-189

in new window

Handle: RePEc:pcp:pucrev:y:2012:i:70:p:142-189
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Av. Universitaria 1801, San Miguel, Lima, Perú

Phone: 626-2000 ext. 4950
Fax: 626-2874
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pcp:pucrev:y:2012:i:70:p:142-189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.