IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Libertad para competir en el mercado: recursos, procesos y resultados

Listed author(s):
  • Javier M. Iguíñiz Echeverría


    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú)

We analyze three concepts of market competition. Although in each one of them one can appreciate the different aspects of freedom, they also contribute specially to some of them. We propose that the “neoclassical general equilibrium” mainly contributes to the discussion of the outcomes of an economic activity, the “barriers to entry” approach calls for a study of the resources necessary to compete and the “competition as a process” approach emphasizes the competitive activity itself. Moreover, as we move from the first onwards, enriching the meaning of competition, the possibility of losing opportunities to participate in the market becomes more evident. Entry and exit are part of the competitive process. Each concept of competition responds to theories that specify or allude to certain types and distribution of freedoms of maneuver of economic agents. Throughout this study we often quote Amartya Sen with the purpose of building bridges between the study of competition and the approach of “development as freedom”.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Fondo Editorial - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú in its journal Revista Economia.

Volume (Year): 34 (2011)
Issue (Month): 68 ()
Pages: 170-191

in new window

Handle: RePEc:pcp:pucrev:y:2011:i:68:p:170-191
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Av. Universitaria 1801, San Miguel, Lima, Perú

Phone: 626-2000 ext. 4950
Fax: 626-2874
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pcp:pucrev:y:2011:i:68:p:170-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.