IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pcp/pucrev/y2006i57-58p89-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interrogantes sobre genealogía y dinámicas de la ciudadanía

Author

Listed:
  • Daniele Pompejano

    (Profesor del Departamento de Estudios Históricos de la Universidad de Palermo, Italia)

Abstract

The main hypotesis of this article relys on the Colonial social relationship and the neoclassicists philosophy as the roots of Latin America authoritarian rule. From the concept of “natural” human being, patronizing and clientelism drove to an asymmetric relationship between authority and individuals within a corporative society. Although the Borbonism and liberalism had been strong dynamic forces, they were unsuccessful for changing such scheme and only a secularization process could timidly be carried on. For consequence, the Latin America politic modernization went on an authoritarian way, turning to populism, whereas individual became subaltern of the State; so, citizenship become indefinitely postponed.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniele Pompejano, 2006. "Interrogantes sobre genealogía y dinámicas de la ciudadanía," Revista Economía, Fondo Editorial - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, issue 57-58, pages 89-136.
  • Handle: RePEc:pcp:pucrev:y:2006:i:57-58:p:89-136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/economia/article/view/272/264
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pcp:pucrev:y:2006:i:57-58:p:89-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/depucpe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.