IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v9y2022i1d10.1057_s41599-022-01237-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of iconic practice in Bruno’s gnoseology

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng Wang

    (China University of Political Science and Law)

Abstract

The iconic praxis plays a vital role in Giordano Bruno’s gnoseological process. Bruno considers the image to be both sensitive and intelligible according to its faculty of Phantasia, which traditionally is condemned as the umbra (shadow) or false reflection of the idea. Through the cognitive practice in the art of memory, Bruno’s shadows symbolically take on those iconic forms and the mental schemas, and then the mnemotechnic shadows become a psychological vehicle, which can raise the human gradually up to the Divine glow. The theological rhythm of ascent and descent is also related to the operations of natural magic that can exert sympathetic links between the micro and the macrocosms. Hence the function of Bruno’s illustrations does not lie in the mechanical interpretation but depends on the private experience of the people who practice them. By means of the interior contractio (contraction) of the soul, Bruno is able to collect the celestial influences with his theurgic xylographs, which make him unique among the Renaissance and early modern philosophers.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng Wang, 2022. "The role of iconic practice in Bruno’s gnoseology," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:9:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-022-01237-x
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-022-01237-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-022-01237-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-022-01237-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:9:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-022-01237-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.