Author
Listed:
- Azucena Gracia
(Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón (CITA)
(CITA-Universidad de Zaragoza))
- Cristina Mallor
((CITA-Universidad de Zaragoza)
Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón (CITA))
Abstract
This study determines which labels should be used to differentiate vegetables cultivated in Aragon in the local market, according to consumer preferences. The aim is to analyse the importance consumers attach when buying fresh vegetables to different labels commonly used to market these products. The labels analysed were “Organic”, “Protected Designation of Origin (PDO)”, “C’Alial regional brand”, “Km0”, “Local sales”, “Local variety”, and “Collective producer brand”. A Best-Worst method, in which the respondents must indicate which label is the most and least important, was used. Data was gathered using an online survey of vegetable consumers in Aragon. The sample was stratified by age, gender, and province of residence. Label importance for consumers was assumed to be heterogeneous, and a Latent Class (LC) model was estimated. Results indicate that the most important labels were “Local sales”, followed by “Km0”, “Local variety”, “PDO” and “Organic”. The least valued labels were “C’Alial” and “Collective producer brand”. Therefore, according to the obtained results, producers should focus on proximity markets using local varieties. Consumers’ heterogeneity in the importance they attached to different labels was found. Four classes of consumers were detected and explained by socio-demographic characteristics, the importance of vegetable attributes, the frequency of vegetable consumption, the knowledge of the method of production, and the attitudes and intention to purchase vegetables from local landraces. Accordingly, different strategies should be used to attract different consumers.
Suggested Citation
Azucena Gracia & Cristina Mallor, 2025.
"Exploring consumer label preferences for fresh vegetables in Aragon: insights for market differentiation,"
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05936-z
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05936-z
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05936-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/palcomms/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.