Author
Listed:
- Yiming Guo
(School of Journalism and Communication, Xiamen University
Guangdong School of Communist Youth League of China (Guangdong Youth University of Political Studies))
- Longzhao Zheng
(School of Journalism and Communication, Xiamen University)
- Hongfeng Qiu
(School of Journalism and Communication, Xiamen University)
Abstract
While previous studies have examined how people’s daily conversations about appearance influence women’s cosmetic surgery intentions through the mediation of self-objectification, the role of women’s agency for risk control has been neglected. By integrating tripartite influence and risk information seeking models, this study investigates both the long- and short-term motivations underlying young Chinese women’s cosmetic surgery decision-making. This shows that social-mediated exposure to beauty ideals and enhancement issues (BIEIs) contributes to self-objectification more greatly than parent-daughter and peer discussions about appearance. Parent-daughter discussions about appearance not only enhances self-objectification but also compromises the perceived norms against cosmetic surgery, which is associated with less frequency of online risk information seeking. While talking about appearance with peers promotes self-objectification, it is also positively associated with affective risk responses, which in turn motivate young women to seek risk information online. Ironically, risk information seeking may further strengthen cosmetic surgery intentions. This implies that the information individuals seek is not necessarily what they obtain. On the Internet, substantial risk information may be marginalized and distorted, making information seeking a ritual process for young women to merely strengthen their cosmetic surgery intentions, thus necessitating urgent governance.
Suggested Citation
Yiming Guo & Longzhao Zheng & Hongfeng Qiu, 2025.
"Self-objectification and the agency for risk information seeking in women’s cosmetic surgery decision-making,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05909-2
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05909-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05909-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.