Author
Listed:
- Su Yang
(Anhui Jianzhu University)
- Ting Wang
(Anhui Jianzhu University)
- Jie Shen
(Anhui Jianzhu University)
- Kun Lu
(Shanghai Jiao Tong University)
- Huihua Chen
(Central South University)
- Baoquan Cheng
(Central South University
City University of Hong Kong)
Abstract
Although widely regarded as a catalyst for cleaner production, the impact of carbon trading on the construction sector, particularly under regional heterogeneity, remains insufficiently examined. This study examines the effect of carbon trading policies on Green Total Factor Productivity (GTFP) in China’s construction industry, with a focus on the mediating role of Green Technology Innovation (GTI) and regional heterogeneity. Using provincial panel data from 2004 to 2020, we apply static and dynamic Difference-in-Differences models and construct a Super-SBM GML index to measure GTFP. The results show that carbon trading significantly enhances GTFP, mainly through promoting Green Technological Change (GTC), with stronger effects observed in eastern and central regions and in provinces with higher overcapacity. Mediation analysis confirms that GTI partially explains the policy’s effect on GTFP. We also identify an inverted U-shaped relationship between GTI and GTFP, indicating that while GTI generally improves GTFP, its marginal returns may decline beyond a certain threshold. Most provinces remain below this point, suggesting continued room for positive gains through green innovation. The study provides empirical evidence from panel estimation and mechanism testing, and theoretical support grounded in the Porter Hypothesis and innovation-driven regulation theory, offering insights into how carbon trading can advance green productivity in high-emission sectors and inform low-carbon transition strategies in developing economies.
Suggested Citation
Su Yang & Ting Wang & Jie Shen & Kun Lu & Huihua Chen & Baoquan Cheng, 2025.
"Evaluating the impacts of carbon trading on green total productivity in construction: Insights from panel data in China,"
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05907-4
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05907-4
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05907-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/palcomms/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.