IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05904-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring healthcare professional students’ perceptions of disaster management: a mixed-methods study

Author

Listed:
  • Banan Mukhalalati

    (Health Sector Qatar University)

  • Nahla Hamed

    (Health Sector Qatar University)

  • Farah Bakri

    (Health Sector Qatar University)

  • Aisha Badawy

    (Health Sector Qatar University)

  • Salma Abbas

    (Health Sector Qatar University)

  • Sara Elshami

    (Health Sector Qatar University)

  • Mohamed Ibrahim

    (Health Sector Qatar University)

Abstract

The increasing frequency of disasters highlights the role of healthcare professional students (HCPS) as future responders and potential volunteers during crises. However, much of the existing research focuses narrowly on specific disciplines, such as nursing and medicine, which restricts a comprehensive understanding of perspectives across the broader interprofessional health professions. Additionally, countries with low disaster risk are often overlooked, despite the potential for preparedness complacency and underinvestment in training and resources. This study explores HCPS perceptions in Qatar, examining their knowledge, attitudes, and readiness for disaster response, while identifying barriers and facilitators to enhance preparedness. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach was used. Quantitative data were collected via a self-reported questionnaire aligned with the Disaster Management Framework and administered to HCPS from Qatar University Health Cluster. Qualitative data were gathered through six online focus groups (FGs) conducted via Microsoft Teams and analyzed using thematic analysis, guided by the Haddon Matrix Framework. Out of 1,392 invited participants, 455 HCPS responded (response rate = 32.7%), and 35 joined FGs. HCPS demonstrated a fair level of perceived knowledge (Median [IQR] = 44 [8]), good attitudes (Median [IQR] = 39 [5]), and good perceived readiness to practice (Median [IQR] = 42 [6]). HCPS emphasized the importance of training, practical simulations, and mental health support. Facilitators for student preparedness included institutional backing and social media for communication, while barriers included limited knowledge, psychological readiness challenges, and time constraints due to academic demands, such as coursework, exams, and clinical training. Despite positive attitudes, HCPS perceived knowledge gaps and readiness barriers. Interdisciplinary training integrating practical and psychological skills is crucial to developing a well-prepared healthcare workforce, particularly in regions considered at low disaster risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Banan Mukhalalati & Nahla Hamed & Farah Bakri & Aisha Badawy & Salma Abbas & Sara Elshami & Mohamed Ibrahim, 2025. "Exploring healthcare professional students’ perceptions of disaster management: a mixed-methods study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05904-7
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05904-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05904-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05904-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05904-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.