IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05889-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond colourblind casting: historical revisionism and Afrocentric blackwashing of Cleopatra in contemporary media

Author

Listed:
  • Azhar Jalil Saeed

    (Southeast University)

  • Meiqin Li

    (Southeast University)

  • Qian Wu

    (Southeast University)

  • Xinlei Yan

    (Southeast University)

Abstract

Systemic oppression and racial hierarchies have historically dictated the representational paradigms of African Americans in media, legitimising reductive stereotypes. Recent shifts toward inclusivity have precipitated debates regarding the concept of colourblind casting. By scrutinising the controversy surrounding Netflix’s Queen Cleopatra (2023) as a case study, this paper examines the tension between historical accuracy and Afrocentric representation. Through a thematic analysis of films and television series, the study critiques how colourblind casting in historical narratives often prioritises contemporary racial discourse over historical accuracy. Moreover, it argues that blackwashing possibly devalues Black identity to a marketable aesthetic, perpetuates colonial frameworks, and obscures systemic inequities. The study concludes by advocating for nuanced historical adaptations that centre Afrocentric heritage, which offers critical implications for media representation and scholars of racial discourse.

Suggested Citation

  • Azhar Jalil Saeed & Meiqin Li & Qian Wu & Xinlei Yan, 2025. "Beyond colourblind casting: historical revisionism and Afrocentric blackwashing of Cleopatra in contemporary media," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05889-3
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05889-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05889-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05889-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05889-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.