IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05838-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling and guiding mechanism of asymmetric study willingness within the professional learning community for graduate students

Author

Listed:
  • Qiu Can

    (Xianyang Normal University)

  • Jinming Chang

    (Northwestern Polytechnical University)

  • Xiaolin Liu

    (Zhejiang University)

  • Dengxiu Yu

    (Northwestern Polytechnical University)

  • C. L. Philip Chen

    (South China University of Technology)

Abstract

This paper proceeds from professional learning community for graduate students that promotes individual growth as well as team growth. The professional learning community is characterized of asymmetric study willingness, which means that study among community members is not necessarily bidirectional, but can also be unidirectional. But there is a research gap in the modeling of asymmetric study willingness. Development of general artificial intelligence provides some implications for the research of professional learning community, and this paper introduces a CAIDD (Continuous Action Iterated Double-layer Dilemma) model to simulate the asymmetric study willingness of community members. Within the professional learning community, crucial members can better facilitate the communication network and improve the group dynamics of the community. So we divide the communication network within the professional learning community into two layers and put forwards a double-layer communication network. Teacher leaders form the upper layer while graduate students form the second layer of the network. To improve the effectiveness, a guiding mechanism of LQR(linear quadratic regulator) is introduced to guide the upper layer of teachers. The Lyapunov function is designed to prove the effectiveness of the proposed model and the guiding mechanism. And this is complemented by an in-depth discussion.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiu Can & Jinming Chang & Xiaolin Liu & Dengxiu Yu & C. L. Philip Chen, 2025. "Modeling and guiding mechanism of asymmetric study willingness within the professional learning community for graduate students," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05838-0
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05838-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05838-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05838-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05838-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.