Author
Listed:
- Wei Zhang
(Northeastern University)
- Liang Zhou
(Lanzhou Jiaotong University)
- Yan Zhang
(Zhongnan University of Economics and Law)
- Chunliang Xiu
(Northeastern University)
Abstract
Extreme climate, natural disasters, and deep poverty have triggered increasingly common migration worldwide. China’s resettlement projects have relocated approximately 10 million residents from disaster-prone, drought-prone, mountainous areas to suitable resettlement sites. However, ecological migration (EM) and short-period resettlement site selection may pose potential risks to the sustainable development of resettlement. Furthermore, previous research has focused on immigrants’ livelihoods but paid less attention to resettlement suitability (RS) in arid mountainous areas. This paper conducts a case study investigating the measurement, differences, and obstacles of RS for EM resettlement sites in northwest China’s mountainous regions. We select 29 indicators from five dimensions, including geology, climate, economy, transportation, and public services, to construct an assessment model of RS. The results show that resettlement site suitability is inversely related to altitude and directly related to economic vitality. RS along traffic arteries and near water systems is significantly higher than in other areas. Long-distance resettlement’s average suitability is 14.63% higher than short-distance resettlement, facilitating migration resettlement. Topographic and geological conditions are the primary factors hindering RS in arid mountainous areas, with an obstacle degree of 37.11%. Flat terrain, convenient water access, and medical treatment are crucial for RS. This research offers insights into EM decisions in arid mountainous areas and improving RS and regional sustainable development under global climate change.
Suggested Citation
Wei Zhang & Liang Zhou & Yan Zhang & Chunliang Xiu, 2025.
"Is the resettlement suitability of migrants in arid mountainous areas high or low? A case study of ecological migration in Gansu Province, China,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05833-5
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05833-5
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05833-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.