Author
Abstract
Improving individuals’ self-reported health is crucial for the well-being of families and the promotion of high-quality economic and social development. Most studies have focused on the influence of household wealth on individuals’ self-reported health. In contrast to previous research, based on a quasi-natural experiment of housing system reform, which potentially induced a positive shock to household wealth, this study examines the impact of housing system reform on self-reported health of residents in China. Based on the data from China Health and Nutrition Survey between 1991 and 2011, this study employed difference-in-differences model to investigate the impact of housing system reform on individuals’ self-reported health. The findings of the study demonstrate a significant positive impact of housing system reform on the self-reported health of residents. Furthermore, to ensure the robustness of the estimated results, we conducted a series of additional tests, including re-estimation using the PSM-DID approach, exclusion of potential confounding policies, redefinition of the control group, inclusion of province–time joint fixed effects, and counterfactual analysis. All these robustness checks consistently confirm that the housing system reform exerts a significant positive impact on self-reported health. The results of heterogeneity analysis indicate that housing system reform has a more pronounced impact on the self-reported health of residents in eastern regions, women, older, as well as low-income individuals. The results of the mechanism analysis suggest that housing system reform may enhance individuals’ self-reported health by reducing the likelihood of overwork. Further analysis also confirms that housing system reform has a more pronounced impact on the self-rated health of residents with lower levels of education.
Suggested Citation
Rui Zhang & Ping Peng & Yiming Su & Zheyu Lin & Dawei Feng, 2025.
"Wealth shocks and self-reported health: evidence from the quasi natural experiment of housing system reform in China,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05826-4
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05826-4
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05826-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.