IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05821-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the impact of linguistic proficiency and individual difference factors on interpreting performance among Chinese student interpreters

Author

Listed:
  • Xing Xing

    (South-Central Minzu University)

Abstract

This study investigates the interplay between linguistic proficiency and individual difference factors—specifically, interpreting motivation, personality hardiness, self-efficacy, goal orientation, and interpreting anxiety—in shaping interpreting performance among Chinese student interpreters. Linguistic proficiency was assessed using the Interpreting Comprehensive Aptitude Test from the China Accreditation Test for Translators and Interpreters (CATTI), chosen for its relevance and established validity. Individual difference factors were measured using validated scales tailored for Chinese interpreter trainees to ensure reliability. Interpreting performance was evaluated through the CATTI Interpreting Practice Test, providing a standardized measure of practical skills. A cohort of 64 Chinese undergraduate interpreting students participated, a sample size consistent with similar studies, though it may limit broad generalizability. Pearson correlation analyses revealed significant correlations between interpreting performance and both linguistic proficiency (r = 0.711) and individual difference factors, except for goal orientation, with interpreting motivation (r = 0.696) and anxiety (r = −0.708) showing strong associations. Multiple regression analyses identified linguistic proficiency, interpreting motivation, and interpreting anxiety as significant predictors of performance. Hierarchical regression analyses indicated that linguistic proficiency moderated the anxiety-performance relationship, with higher proficiency mitigating anxiety’s negative impact. These findings underscore the complex interaction between linguistic skills and individual difference factors in interpreting, suggesting that interpreter training programs should integrate targeted language enhancement with strategies for boosting motivation and managing anxiety, such as diverse interpreting scenarios and stress management techniques. This study emphasizes the need for a holistic approach in interpreter education that addresses both linguistic and individual difference aspects of performance, providing insights for educators and program developers.

Suggested Citation

  • Xing Xing, 2025. "Exploring the impact of linguistic proficiency and individual difference factors on interpreting performance among Chinese student interpreters," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05821-9
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05821-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05821-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05821-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05821-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.