IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05791-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International critical reception of acclaimed Chinese films: a content analysis of film reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Chunlin Tian

    (Xi’an International Studies University)

Abstract

Film reviews promote and comment on films. Studying reviews on Chinese films by international critics sheds light on the critical reception of Chinese cinema. This study investigates how international critics assess four critically acclaimed Chinese films: Lust, Caution, Tuya’s Marriage, Stray Dogs, and Black Coal, Thin Ice. These selected films have been acclaimed at A-listed international film festivals in the past 18 years (2007–2024) with top prize or runner-up. This research collects 112 film reviews drawn from professional critics and personal sources (for example, Sight and Sound, Variety, Reel Views, and Robert Cashill) and builds a corpus. These reviews are analyzed by a framework that includes constituent elements of film reviews such as motif, narrative, mise-en-scène, composition, image, and genre. This framework draws from film theory and criticism on structural and cultural aspects of films. It enables the close reading of film reviews and reveals how elements of films contribute to the reception. The findings suggest that critics favor Chinese films that address realistic themes, feature concise and fast-paced narratives, demonstrate cohesive mise-en-scène and composition within the film, and negotiate with genre tropes. This research provides insights into what international critics think of Chinese cinema and hopefully inspires filmmakers to produce films that participate in global communication. The limitation is that this study only selects film reviews written in English that is the most widely used language and serves as the lingua franca for global communication. Reliance on reviews written in English could inadvertently introduce a certain degree of bias. Future research could explore film reviews in other languages to reveal the global reception of Chinese cinema.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunlin Tian, 2025. "International critical reception of acclaimed Chinese films: a content analysis of film reviews," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05791-y
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05791-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05791-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05791-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05791-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.