IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05786-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On facts concerning scientific research: responding to the crisis of legitimacy of science

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Longo

    (Université Paris Cité)

  • Giuseppe Viola

    (Queen Mary University of London)

  • Roberto Volpe

    (Queen Mary University of London)

Abstract

In this paper, we deal with the issue of the spreading decline of trust in science. The scope of our work is to address the problem by showing the limits of the current way of coping with it. We propose a more comprehensive historical and philosophical contextualization. Accordingly, we suggest that the increased uneasiness often lamented by the scientific community can be read as the symptom of the periodical crisis of legitimation that precedes important epistemological changes. Rather than protecting the authority of scientific knowledge by increasing its autonomy and independence, we suggest that trust might be regained by adapting the practices to the significant transformations that our societies need and will undergo. In order to contribute to the emerging discussions on the topic, we propose some leads and advocate a call to establish more transdisciplinary communities working towards a more collaborative, transparent and communicative science for all.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Longo & Giuseppe Viola & Roberto Volpe, 2025. "On facts concerning scientific research: responding to the crisis of legitimacy of science," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05786-9
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05786-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05786-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05786-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05786-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.