Author
Listed:
- Luyuan Wang
(South China University of Technology)
- Rui Liu
(South China University of Technology
Architectural Design and Research Institute of South China University of Technology)
- Zhibo Wang
(South China University of Technology)
- Yingliang Zheng
(South China University of Technology)
- Zhaoyi Ye
(South China University of Technology)
- Jin Tao
(South China University of Technology
State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building and Urban Science)
Abstract
This paper examines the development of modern universities in China between 1840 and 1949—a period marked by the negotiation and coexistence of diverse value systems. During this time, the university spirit integrated diverse civilizational cores, which is reflected in the spatial design of the campuses. Taking 25 modern Chinese universities as research subjects. Employing a bifurcated historical methodology and the theory of cultural hybridity, the research traces the history of university construction and outlines the historical framework of university spirit through material forms. The research reveals that cultural hybridity follows a phased pattern of “encounter—appropriation—adaptation—integration—new ecological form.” In the semi-colonial context, diverse actors actively participated in dynamic processes of cultural hybridization, which profoundly shaped spatial forms. The transformation of the modern university spirit is reflected in the creative translation of spatial morphology. Based on these findings, the study proposes a dynamic model for campus heritage conservation, viewing the campus as a continuously evolving whole. Moving beyond the research paradigm of architectural history, it introduces a multi-threaded model of cultural hybridity, offering historical insights for cultivating a distinctive university identity in the era of globalization.
Suggested Citation
Luyuan Wang & Rui Liu & Zhibo Wang & Yingliang Zheng & Zhaoyi Ye & Jin Tao, 2025.
"Cultural hybridity and ideological shifts: shaping the campus space of modern Chinese universities,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05781-0
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05781-0
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05781-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.