IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05780-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stress and burnout among social workers – a relation mediated by coping styles

Author

Listed:
  • Anca Mihai

    (University of Bucharest)

  • Elen Silvana Crivoi

    (University of Bucharest
    National Scientific Research Institute for Labour and Social Protection)

  • Lucian Alecu

    (University of Bucharest)

  • Ovidiu Pop

    (University of Bucharest)

  • Daniela Nita

    (University of Bucharest)

  • Georgiana Cristina Rentea

    (University of Bucharest)

  • Adrian Luca

    (University of Bucharest)

  • Florin Lazar

    (University of Bucharest
    National College of Social Workers in Romania)

Abstract

As social workers experience higher levels of stress and burnout than comparable occupational groups, understanding what mediates their relationship could help develop adequate support services. Little is known about the mediating role of social workers’ coping strategies in the relationship between perceived stress and burnout, even more so in Romania, where the profession was reinstated after the fall of communism. We used measures of stress (Perceived Stress Questionnaire), coping (Brief-COPE), and burnout (Copenhagen Burnout Inventory-CBI). Following previous research, in a convenience sample of registered social workers (n = 324), we first test if stress and burnout are statistically significant correlated and second if problem-focused, emotion-focused, and avoidant coping mediate the relationship between stress and personal and work-related burnout experienced by Romanian social workers. Results show that avoidant coping (standardized indirect effect 0.044) partially mediates the relation between stress and personal burnout and emotion-focused coping (standardized indirect effect 0.022) partially mediates the relation between stress and work-related burnout, both having a reduced mediation impact. However, problem-focused coping does not mediate the relationship between stress and burnout. There is a low positive and significant partial mediation of (a) self-blame coping strategy (standardized indirect effect 0.046) in the relation between perceived stress and personal burnout and (b) denial coping strategy (standardized indirect effect 0.022) in the relation between perceived stress and work-related burnout. When comparing perceived stress and burnout levels, a more frequent use of maladaptive coping strategies leads to higher levels of stress and burnout, while a more frequent use of adaptive strategies has no effect. Our data show the need for training and developing adequate mechanisms to help social workers regulate stress levels. Future studies should investigate the role external factors (e.g., organizational or structural) play in reducing burnout levels and assuring that social workers’ needs for a healthy working climate are met.

Suggested Citation

  • Anca Mihai & Elen Silvana Crivoi & Lucian Alecu & Ovidiu Pop & Daniela Nita & Georgiana Cristina Rentea & Adrian Luca & Florin Lazar, 2025. "Stress and burnout among social workers – a relation mediated by coping styles," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05780-1
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05780-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05780-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05780-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05780-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.