Author
Abstract
Aesthetic experiences in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are uniquely shaped by atypical sensory processing, particularly in response to visual stimuli such as color and texture. While existing literature has explored general sensory sensitivities in ASD, little is known about how specific sensory attributes influence visual art preferences in this population. This study addresses this gap by investigating the relationship between sensory processing differences and aesthetic preferences for color intensity (soft vs. bold) and texture complexity (smooth vs. rough) in individuals with ASD. Using a mixed-methods design, 46 participants aged 6–40 years, representing varied sensory sensitivity profiles and gender identities, were presented with a series of custom-designed paintings differing systematically in color and texture. Quantitative data were obtained from 120 structured survey responses using a 5-point Likert scale to rate aesthetic preference, and qualitative data were gathered through in-depth interviews with a purposive subsample of 15 participants to capture emotional and sensory interpretations of their choices. Statistical analysis using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) revealed that individuals with high sensory sensitivity predominantly preferred soft colors and smooth textures, often associating them with comfort, calmness, and reduced sensory overload. In contrast, those with lower sensitivity levels exhibited a broader range of preferences, including a greater tolerance for or interest in bold colors and rough textures. These findings suggest that sensory sensitivity significantly influences visual aesthetic experiences in ASD, with potential implications for personalized therapeutic interventions, inclusive art education, and sensory-friendly design practices.
Suggested Citation
Li Liu, 2025.
"Analysing the impact of sensory processing differences on color and texture preferences in individuals with autism spectrum disorder,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05753-4
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05753-4
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05753-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.