IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05749-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Intelligence and the limits of reason: a framework for responsible use in public and private sectors

Author

Listed:
  • Akhil Bhardwaj

    (University of Bath)

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly positioned as a transformative force across public and private sectors. Yet, its adoption raises critical questions about reasoning, accountability, and the limits of machine cognition. This study draws on the philosophy of science as well as well as theories of organizations to argue that current AI systems—despite their predictive and generative capabilities—lack essential human faculties such as ability to engage in abductive reasoning, grasp analogies and metaphors, interpret sparse or nuanced data. These limitations have profound implications for decision-making, particularly in democratic societies where legal and ethical accountability are paramount. We propose a pragmatic framework for the responsible use of AI, distinguishing between ‘reliable’ and ‘frontier’ technologies, and aligning their deployment with sector-specific obligations. By situating AI within broader epistemic and institutional contexts, the framework offers actionable guidance for aligning technological innovation with democratic values and ethical governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Akhil Bhardwaj, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence and the limits of reason: a framework for responsible use in public and private sectors," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-7, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05749-0
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05749-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05749-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05749-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05749-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.