Author
Listed:
- Jian Li
(Beijing Normal University
Beijing Normal University)
- Eryong Xue
(Beijing Normal University
Beijing Normal University)
- Yunshu He
(Beijing Normal University
Beijing Normal University)
- Xinyi Wang
(Beijing Normal University
Beijing Normal University)
- Ran Wu
(Beijing Normal University
Beijing Normal University)
Abstract
Supervisory interactions play an important role in the academic development of doctoral students. Previous studies have recognized and examined the role of supervision in doctoral students’ academic socialization. However, there are few empirical longitudinal studies to investigate the dynamic process of doctoral’ students’ academic capital accumulation, and the role of their supervisory interaction process. To address this gap, this study used a semi-collaborative mixed ethnographic approach to explore how supervisory interactions mediate doctoral students’ academic cultural (re)production. Data collection spanned a 3-year period and involved several methods: instant messaging between researchers and participants, face-to-face interviews, and online and offline focus groups. Informed by Bourdieu’s cultural reproduction theory, data were subjected to thematic analysis. The analyses identified three dimensions in doctoral supervisory interactions by which students accumulated academic “capital”: inheritance, dependence, and imitation. Confrontation and recognition are embedded in gaming in the academic “field”. Accumulation and internalization are integrated to shape the academic “habitus”. This study contributes new insights into doctoral supervision interaction as a part of academic cultural (re)production process. The findings have important implications for understanding the process of doctoral supervision and the accumulation of doctoral students’ academic capital contextually.
Suggested Citation
Jian Li & Eryong Xue & Yunshu He & Xinyi Wang & Ran Wu, 2025.
"Obeying, following, imitating, and hoping to shape the academic habitus: Supervisory interactions and doctoral students’ academic cultural (re)production,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05735-6
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05735-6
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05735-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.