IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05675-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Immunization effect of inoculation messages: interventions against consensus and misinformation to improve public acceptance of recycled water

Author

Listed:
  • Hanliang Fu

    (Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology)

  • Yuexin Li

    (Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology)

  • Zhifang Wu

    (University of South Australia)

  • Yubing Tan

    (Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology)

  • Weijie He

    (Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology)

  • Jian Zuo

    (University of Adelaide)

Abstract

The global freshwater crisis is accelerating, posing an urgent need for sustainable water solutions. Despite its potential as a viable alternative, recycled water has yet to gain widespread public acceptance. A key barrier is the public’ low intention to use it. Grounded in inoculation theory, this study explores the mechanism through which different types of information influence public acceptance of recycled water. Using eye-tracking technology, it examines the mediating role of information reception effects. The cognitive processing involved in the interaction between inoculation messages, scientific consensus, and misinformation is examined through the lens of dual-processing theory. The results demonstrate a public preference for misinformation about recycled water, leading to lower acceptance when both scientific consensus and misinformation are presented simultaneously. However, inoculation messages effectively mitigate the impact of misinformation while enhancing the reception effects of scientific consensus, resulting in increased acceptance among participants exposed to inoculation. From a micro-level perspective of eye movement behavior, this study illustrates the underlying cognitive mechanism underlying inoculation theory - specifically, how inoculation messages exert immunization effects by either suppressing cognitive processing of misinformation or reinforcing motivated reasoning of scientific consensus. By integrating inoculation theory and dual-processing theory, this study also provides empirical support for negative preference theory within a cognitive science framework. The findings provide practical insights for public communication campaigns, highlighting the value of inoculation strategies in shaping public attitudes toward recycled water. We recommend that marketing efforts incorporate inoculation strategies to foster public attitudinal resilience and prioritize the integration of scientific consensus and inoculation messages in public outreach materials.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanliang Fu & Yuexin Li & Zhifang Wu & Yubing Tan & Weijie He & Jian Zuo, 2025. "Immunization effect of inoculation messages: interventions against consensus and misinformation to improve public acceptance of recycled water," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05675-1
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05675-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05675-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05675-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05675-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.