IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05641-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial intelligence, social influence, and AI anxiety: analyzing the intentions of science doctoral students to use ChatGPT with PLS-SEM

Author

Listed:
  • Fatih Uludağ

    (Department of Econometrics, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University)

  • Eylem Kılıç

    (Department of Computer Education and Educational Technology Van Yüzüncü Yıl University)

  • H.Eray Çelik

    (Department of Econometrics, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University)

Abstract

The widespread use of AI-based applications, such as ChatGPT, in higher education has raised questions about how doctoral students adopt these technologies, particularly in science departments. However, traditional models, such as the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), may fall short in fully capturing users’ behavioral intentions toward emerging technologies. This study aims to investigate PhD students’ behavioral intention to use ChatGPT for learning purposes by proposing an extended version of the TAM. The proposed model incorporates five additional factors: Social Influence (SI), Perceived Enjoyment (PEN), AI Self-Efficacy (AI-SE), AI’s Sociotechnical Blindness (AI-STB), and Perceived Ethics (AI-PET). Data were collected from 361 PhD students across 35 universities and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results reveal that all proposed factors significantly influence students’ behavioral intention to use ChatGPT. This study contributes to the literature by introducing new external variables into the TAM framework and providing empirical insights into doctoral students’ acceptance of AI tools in science education, thereby offering a novel perspective for future research and educational practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatih Uludağ & Eylem Kılıç & H.Eray Çelik, 2025. "Artificial intelligence, social influence, and AI anxiety: analyzing the intentions of science doctoral students to use ChatGPT with PLS-SEM," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05641-x
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05641-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05641-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05641-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lim, Joon Soo & Zhang, Jun, 2022. "Adoption of AI-driven personalization in digital news platforms: An integrative model of technology acceptance and perceived contingency," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Hair, Joe F. & Howard, Matt C. & Nitzl, Christian, 2020. "Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 101-110.
    3. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2000. "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 342-365, December.
    4. Marko Sarstedt & Christian M. Ringle & Joseph F. Hair, 2022. "Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling," Springer Books, in: Christian Homburg & Martin Klarmann & Arnd Vomberg (ed.), Handbook of Market Research, pages 587-632, Springer.
    5. Jörg Garrel & Jana Mayer, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence in studies—use of ChatGPT and AI-based tools among students in Germany," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    7. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2022. "Adoption and use of AI tools: a research agenda grounded in UTAUT," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 641-652, January.
    8. Wayne Geerling & G. Dirk Mateer & Jadrian Wooten & Nikhil Damodaran, 2023. "ChatGPT has Aced the Test of Understanding in College Economics: Now What?," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 68(2), pages 233-245, October.
    9. Tomaž Kosar & Dragana Ostojić & Yu David Liu & Marjan Mernik, 2024. "Computer Science Education in ChatGPT Era: Experiences from an Experiment in a Programming Course for Novice Programmers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Liqiu Zhou & Sijia Xue & Ruiqian Li, 2022. "Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore Students’ Intention to Use an Online Education Platform at a University in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    11. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    12. Collins, Christopher & Dennehy, Denis & Conboy, Kieran & Mikalef, Patrick, 2021. "Artificial intelligence in information systems research: A systematic literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mäntymäki, Matti & Salo, Jari, 2013. "Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo Hotel," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 282-290.
    2. Cliff R. Kikawa & Charity Kiconco & Moses Agaba & Dimas Ntirampeba & Amos Ssematimba & Billy M. Kalema, 2022. "Social Media Marketing for Small and Medium Enterprise Performance in Uganda: A Structural Equation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Nistor, Cristian, 2013. "A conceptual model for the use of social media in companies," MPRA Paper 44224, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Sarv Devaraj & Ming Fan & Rajiv Kohli, 2002. "Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 316-333, September.
    5. Shafiqul Islam & Mohammad Fakhrul Islam & Noor-E- Zannat, 2023. "Behavioral Intention to Use Online for Shopping in Bangladesh: A Technology Acceptance Model Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    6. Juan F. Tavera Mesías & Juan C. S�nchez Giraldo & Bernardo Ballesteros D�az, 2011. "Aceptación del E-Commerce en Colombia: un estudio para la ciudad de Medellín," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada.
    7. Zhiqiang Yuan & Jing Liu & Xi Deng & Tianzi Ding & Tommy Tanu Wijaya, 2023. "Facilitating Conditions as the Biggest Factor Influencing Elementary School Teachers’ Usage Behavior of Dynamic Mathematics Software in China," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Yadgar Taha M. Hamakhan, 2020. "The effect of individual factors on user behaviour and the moderating role of trust: an empirical investigation of consumers’ acceptance of electronic banking in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, December.
    9. Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Marinkovic, Veljko & Ramos de Luna, Iviane & Kalinic, Zoran, 2018. "Predicting the determinants of mobile payment acceptance: A hybrid SEM-neural network approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 117-130.
    10. Deborah Compeau & Barbara Marcolin & Helen Kelley & Chris Higgins, 2012. "Research Commentary ---Generalizability of Information Systems Research Using Student Subjects---A Reflection on Our Practices and Recommendations for Future Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1093-1109, December.
    11. Chen Wei, 2021. "The influence of Consumers’ Purchase intention on Smart Wearable Device: A study of Consumers in East China," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(8), pages 46-72.
    12. Gerli, Paolo & Clement, Jessica & Esposito, Giovanni & Mora, Luca & Crutzen, Nathalie, 2022. "The hidden power of emotions: How psychological factors influence skill development in smart technology adoption," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    13. Kala Kamdjoug, Jean Robert & Wamba-Taguimdje, Serge-Lopez & Wamba, Samuel Fosso & Kake, Ingrid Bive'e, 2021. "Determining factors and impacts of the intention to adopt mobile banking app in Cameroon: Case of SARA by afriland First Bank," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    14. Yoon, Jeewhan & Vonortas, Nicholas S. & Han, SungWon, 2020. "Do-It-Yourself laboratories and attitude toward use: The effects of self-efficacy and the perception of security and privacy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    15. Irfan Bashir & C. Madhavaiah, 2014. "Determinants of Young Consumers’ Intention to Use Internet Banking Services in India," Vision, , vol. 18(3), pages 153-163, September.
    16. Khalil Moghaddam, B. & Khatoon-Abadi, A., 2013. "Factors affecting ICT adoption among rural users: A case study of ICT Center in Iran," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 1083-1094.
    17. Tamara Dinev & Paul Hart, 2006. "An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 61-80, March.
    18. Arif Hasan & S. K. Gupta, 2020. "Exploring Tourists’ Behavioural Intentions Towards Use of Select Mobile Wallets for Digital Payments," Paradigm, , vol. 24(2), pages 177-194, December.
    19. Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Banita Lal & Michael D. Williams & Marc Clement, 2017. "Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 549-568, June.
    20. D. Harrison McKnight & Vivek Choudhury & Charles Kacmar, 2002. "Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 334-359, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05641-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/palcomms/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.